Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Characteristic spatial and frequency distribution of mutations in SCN1A

Abstract

Background

SCN1A is the most well-recognized and commonly mutated gene related to epilepsy. This study analyzed the characteristic spatial and frequency distributions of SCN1A mutations, aiming to provide important insight into the mutagenesis etiopathology of SCN1A-associated epilepsy.

Methods

Epilepsy-associated SCN1A variants were retrieved from the SCN1A mutation database, the HGMD database, and literature reviews. The base substitutions, mutation frequencies in CpG dinucleotides, and spatial distributions of mutations in terms of exons and structural domains were analyzed.

Results

A total of 2621 SCN1A variants were identified in 5106 unrelated cases. The most common type was missense mutation, followed by frameshift mutations and splice site mutations. Among the missense mutations, transitions within CpG dinucleotides were much more recurrently identified than transitions within non-CpG dinucleotides, and the most common type was the G > A transition. Among the nonsense mutations, the most predominant type of single-base substitution was the C > T transition, among which 75.3% (235/312) were within CpG sites. The most common “hotspot” codons for missense mutations were codons 101, 946, and 1783; while for nonsense mutations it was codon 712. One-base deletion or insertion was the most common type of frameshift mutation, causing protein truncation. The three most common frameshift mutations were c.5536_5539delAAAC, c.4554dupA, and c.5010_5013delGTTT. Splice mutations were the most frequently identified in exon 4 with a hotspot site c.602 + 1G > A. The spatial distribution of missense mutations showed that exons 22 and 4 had the highest mutation density (111 and 84 mutations per 100 bp, respectively), and exon 12 had the lowest mutation density, with 4 mutations per 100 bp. Further distribution analysis of the protein domains revealed that missense mutations were more common in the pore region and voltage sensor (231 mutations per 100 amino acids, respectively), and the protein truncation mutations were distributed evenly among the domains.

Conclusions

SCN1A mutations tend to cluster at distinct sites, depending on the characteristic CpG dinucleotides, exons, and functional domains. Higher mutation density in particular regions, such as exon 22 and exon 4, offers promising targets for therapeutic genetic interventions.

Background

The SCN1A gene (MIM *182389), located on human chromosome 2q24 and containing 26 exons, encodes the pore-forming α subunit of the neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.1. The Nav1.1 channel is a large single-chain polypeptide consisting of 2009 amino acids that forms two terminal regions (N-terminal and C-terminal regions) and four homologous domains, designated as DI to DIV. Each of the four homologous domains has six transmembrane helical segments: five hydrophobic segments (S1, S2, S3, S5, and S6) and one positively charged segment (S4). The S4 segment and its link regions serve as voltage sensors that are important for voltage sensing. The S5 and S6 segments and their extracellular connecting regions form the pore region of the channel [1,2,3].

The SCN1A gene stands as the foremost and most prevalent gene associated with epilepsy. Variants in SCN1A give rise to a wide range of epilepsy syndromes, ranging from mild familial febrile seizures (FEB) [4], and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS +) [5], to severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) or Dravet syndrome (DS) [6,7,8]. In addition to epilepsy, SCN1A variants are also associated with other disorders, including familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) [9, 10].

Currently, SCN1A mutations have been reported to be distributed widely across the protein, which include missense mutations, nonsense mutations, frameshifts, splice site variants, small in-frame insertions/deletions, and large insertions/deletions. Among them, missense mutations and truncating mutations that cause protein truncations through nonsense, frameshift, or invariant splice site mutations are the most commonly observed alterations [11, 12]. Clinically, phenotype severity is closely related to the location and type of mutation. Generally, truncation mutations and missense mutations in the pore region are usually associated with severe epilepsies such as DS, whereas missense variants outside the pore region are associated with mild epilepsies [3, 13]. Understanding the type of base substitutions and spatial distribution of SCN1A mutations provides essential information for assisting in precision clinical management and treatment.

In the present study, we systematically reviewed SCN1A mutations associated with epilepsy and analyzed the spatial and frequency distributions, aiming to provide an important insight into the mutagenesis etiopathology of SCN1A-associated epilepsy.

Methods

We systematically reviewed all SCN1A mutations associated with epilepsy from the SCN1A mutation database (http://scn1a.caae.org.cn/) [3] and the Human Gene Mutation Database (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/index.php, version: HGMD Professional) till December 2023, which collected SCN1A mutations published since 2000 [14]. The results from the two databases were cross-checked to avoid duplicate recruitment. The relevant literature was searched and double-checked in the PubMed database. All SCN1A mutations were annotated based on the transcript NM_001165963.4.

In this study, large deletions or large insertions were defined as those involving one or more exons, and those affecting fewer than one exon (one or several base pairs) were classified as small deletions or insertions involving frameshift mutations, in-frame mutations or splicing mutations. Mutations, including intronic single base pair substitutions, deletions, or insertions within invariant 5′GT or 3′AG dinucleotides and deletions that spanned the coding sequence and the intronic invariant dinucleotides, were classified as splicing mutations. The cDNA sequence was scanned for CpG dinucleotides. Altogether, 105 CpG dinucleotides were located throughout the whole cDNA sequence. These CpG dinucleotides can be classified into three forms in the coding sequence: CGN, NCG, and NNC GNN, according to the location of the CpG dinucleotides in a codon.

Missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations were mapped across the Nav1.1 protein. To analyze whether the distribution of these mutations occurred randomly or clustered in special regions, we divided the entire protein into the following six domains: (1) voltage sensor: the S4 segments and their linkers; (2) pore region: regions from the S5 to S6 segments and their neighboring distal portion (approximately 26–35 amino acids; http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P35498); (3) segments S1-S3: regions in the four internal homologous domains except the “voltage sensors” and “pore regions”; (4) D-linkers: linkers between the four homologous domains (DI–DII, DII–DIII, and DIII–DIV); (5) N-terminus: the amino terminal domain; and (6) C-terminus: the carboxy terminal domain.

Statistical analysis

An affected family was considered as a single case in the data analysis. Considering that a given mutation was recurrently reported in unrelated affected families, to avoid confusion, we use "variant" to represent different changes in cDNA (such as base substitutions or different changes at the same cDNA site), and "case" to refer to unrelated individuals or families. The mutation frequencies, hotspot identification, and mutation densities were based on the number of cases. A hotspot mutation refers to a variant that is repeatedly reported in a large number of cases. For exons, mutation densities were calculated as the number of mutations per 100 base pairs; for domains, mutation densities were calculated as the number of mutations per 100 amino acids to adjust for the different sizes.

A Chi-square test was performed to determine the difference in the domain distributions between missense mutations and protein truncation mutations. SPSS 27.0 software was used for statistical analyses. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 2621 SCN1A variants were identified in 5106 unrelated cases, among which 1582 variants were reported only once, and 1039 variants were recurrently reported in 3524 cases. Among all the cases, the most common type was missense mutations (2743/5106, 53.7%), followed by frameshift mutations (921/5106, 18.0%), nonsense mutations (688/5106, 13.5%), and splice site mutations (483/5106, 9.5%). Small insertions/deletions (79/5106, 1.5%), large insertions/deletions (170/5106, 3.3%), complex rearrangements (13/5106, 0.3%), and regulatory substitutions (1/5106, 0.02%) were also observed in the SCN1A gene (Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of SCN1A mutations by mutation types

Distribution of missense mutations

Among the missense mutations, transitions within CpG dinucleotides were more recurrently identified than transitions within non-CpG dinucleotides (139 variants recurrently in 547 cases vs 1157 variants recurrently in 2196 cases). In terms of base transitions (Table 2), G > A transitions (521/2743, 19.0%) were the most common type, followed by T > C (431/2743, 15.71%) and C > T transitions (413/2743, 15.1%). A total of 547 cases with missense mutations, which were clustered within 85 codons with CpG dinucleotides, accounted for 81.0% of all CpG dinucleotides in the entire cDNA sequence. The distribution of these missense mutations in codons is presented in Fig. 1a. The most recurrent missense mutation site was codon 101 (32 times: 15 times for c.301C > T and 17 times for c.302G > A), followed by codon 1783 (31 times: 11 times for c.2836C > T and 20 times for c.2837G > A) and codon 946 (31 times: 19 times for c.2836C > T and 12 times for c.2837G > A). Codon 1783 (GCG), which is flanked by a 5′ cytosine residue and contains 2 CpG dinucleotides (NNC GCG), potentially represents the second most recurrent missense mutation site.

Table 2 Base substitutions of SCN1A point mutations and their distribution in different mutation types
Fig. 1
figure 1

a Distribution of missense mutations (≥ 3 cases) in CpG codons. b Distribution of nonsense mutations in CGA codons

Distribution of nonsense mutations

Among the nonsense mutations, transitions within CpG dinucleotides were highly mutated and repetitive, with 29 nonsenses recurrently reported in 262 cases. The most predominant type of single-base substitution was the C > T transition (312/688, 45.3%), among which 75.3% (235/312) were within CpG sites (Table 2). All 235 cases with nonsense mutations within CpG dinucleotides had mutations in CGA codons (where codon CGA was changed to the termination codon TGA), which converted C > T transitions by methylation-mediated deamination of 5-methylcytosine. The CGA > TGA transitions were distributed among 21 CGA codons (Fig. 1b), with codon 712 being the most recurrent site, with 23 cases, while codon 1933 was reported only once.

Distribution of frameshift mutations

A total of 612 frameshift variants have been reported in 921 unrelated cases, among which 438 variants were reported only once, and 174 variants were recurrently identified in 483 cases (483/921, 52.4%). We then explored the size distributions of frameshift mutations in SCN1A. There were three times more base deletions than base insertions (645 vs 237, Table 1), causing frameshift truncation of SCN1A. The size of the base insertions/deletions ranged from one base pair to 20 base pairs, with one base deletion or insertion being the most common type (Fig. 2a). Notably, the 12-base pair deletion (c.644_655del12) was reported once due to the formation of a termination codon (TGA) by the 5' T and the 3' GA (GCATtgagaacattcaGAGTT), consequently leading to protein truncation. The three most common frameshift mutations are as follows: the four-base pair AAAC deletion in the cDNA sequence CCACAACCaaacAAACTCCA (c.5536_5539delAAAC, recurrently reported 16 times), the one-base pair A insertion in the cDNA sequence AAAaAAA (c.4554dupA, repetitively 8 times), and the four-base pair GTTT deletion in the cDNA sequence GCGTTgtttAAC (c.5010_5013delGTTT, repetitively 7 times).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Size distributions of frameshift mutations in SCN1A. b Spatial distributions of SCN1A splice site mutations by exon. The location of splice site mutations is categorized by the adjacent exon. c Distribution of SCN1A mutation types by domains. Protein truncations include nonsense mutations and frameshift mutations. χ.2 test for comparison between missense and protein truncations, P < 0.001

Distribution of splice site mutations

There were twofold more splice donor site mutations than splice acceptor site mutations (325/158, Table 1). The majority of the splice site mutations (401/483, 83%) were single-base substitutions within 5 bp of the intron-exon boundary, 75.8% of which (304/401) were within invariant 5′GT or 3′AG dinucleotides (i.e., canonical ± 1 or 2 splice sites). Ten splicing mutations were within the deep intron regions, about 2000 bp far apart from the intron-exon boundary, among which nine were within or near a cryptic evolutionarily conserved “poison” exon 20N within intron 20. Splicing mutations were most often identified in exon 4 (Fig. 2b), owing to a hypermutable CpG dinucleotide that was reported 29 times (c.602 + 1G > A) [15,16,17]. Exons 14, 2, and 20 also exhibited relatively higher frequencies of splicing mutations. No other discernable spatial or frequency patterns were observed for the other exons.

Mutation densities by exon

The mutation densities of SCN1A missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations within the 26 coding regions are shown in Table 3. To adjust for the different sizes of SCN1A exons, the mutation densities were calculated as the number of mutations per 100 base pairs. The average mutation densities were 45 mutations/100 bp, 11 mutations/100 bp, and 15 mutations/100 bp for missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations, respectively. Among missense mutations, the highest density was in exon 22 (111 mutations/100 bp), which encodes the pore region, followed by exon 4 (84 mutations/100 bp). Exon 12, which encodes the DI–DII linker, had the lowest mutation density, with 4 mutations/100 bp. The mutation densities in exons showed no obvious differences for nonsense and frameshift mutations.

Table 3 Mutation densities by exon within SCN1A coding regions

Mutation densities by protein domain

To illustrate the mutation densities in the protein domains, we classified each mutation into six domains: the voltage sensor, the pore region, segments S1-S3, D-linkers, N-terminus, and C-terminus. To avoid bias caused by the different sizes of domains, the mutation densities were calculated as the number of mutations per 100 amino acids (aa). There were significant differences in the domain distribution between missense mutations and protein truncation mutations (P < 0.001). The mutation density of missense mutations in the pore region and the voltage sensor was greater (both 231 mutations per 100 aa, respectively), while the density in the other domains was 43–144 mutations per 100 aa; protein truncation mutations are evenly distributed across the six domains. (Fig. 2c).

Discussion

SCN1A is one of the most commonly mutated genes associated with epilepsy with a typical autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. The majority of the mutations occur de novo in the affected children, while a small proportion are inherited from mosaic affected or unaffected parents [18]. SCN1A mutations have different functional impacts, including loss of function (LOF), partial loss of function, decreased excitability, increased excitability, and gain of function (GOF) [3, 18]. Generally, truncation mutations and missense mutations with loss of function in the pore region and the voltage sensor are associated with severe epilepsies such as DS [3]. In the present study, we systematically analyzed the spatial and frequency distributions of mutations in SCN1A. Although SCN1A mutations are distributed widely across the protein, their distribution displays nonrandom patterns with hypermutability of CpG dinucleotides and uneven distributions of missense mutations. SCN1A mutations tend to be clustered at distinct sites, depending on the characteristic CpG dinucleotides, exons, and functional domains.

Transitions within CpG dinucleotides are highly mutated and recurrently reported; 139 missense transitions within CpG dinucleotides have been recurrently reported in 547 cases, and 29 nonsense transitions within CpG dinucleotides have been recurrently reported in 262 cases, indicating that these CpG dinucleotides may be mutation hotspots in the SCN1A gene. At the DNA base pair level, this nonrandom pattern is basically due to the hypermutability of CpG dinucleotides (Table 2). DNA methylation at the cytosine residue of CpG dinucleotides produces 5-methylcytosine, which results in a C > T and corresponding G > A transition on the complementary DNA strand by deamination. These cytosine nucleotides are particularly susceptible to mutations during meiosis and early embryogenesis due to methylation [19]. The reason why methylated CpG dinucleotides have a high rate of transition is that both exogenous and endogenous mutagens preferentially target methylated CpG dinucleotides over their unmethylated counterparts [20,21,22]. Approximately 60–90% of cytosine residues in CpG dinucleotides in the human genome are methylated, while unmethylated dinucleotides are primarily clustered in promoter regions of housekeeping genes [23]. CpG dinucleotide methylation has important implications for the etiology of genetic disease, as suggested by the fact that 20–50% of point mutations in different genes result from transitions within CpG dinucleotides [24,25,26,27].

Interestingly, these hypermutable CpG transitions in nonsense mutations preferentially occur at CGA codons, where C > T transitions change arginine codons (CGA) to stop codons (TGA). CGA is the only codon for which deamination of a CpG dinucleotide generates a stop codon. Although arginine codons 222 and 712 were the most frequent mutant codons (Fig. 1b), there was no evidence showing that the spatial distribution of the arginine codons influenced the mutation frequency: codon 222 was located in DIS4, whereas codon 712 was distributed in D-linkers. Furthermore, while the 3′ CGA codon 1933 has only 1 mutation, there is no evidence showing that 5′ CGA codons are preferentially mutated with respect to 3′ CGA codons (Fig. 1b). However, the most frequent mutant codons resulting in missense mutations were located in the pore region (codons 393, 946 and 1783) and the voltage sensor (codon 1648) (Fig. 1a), suggesting that the structural location influences the frequency of missense mutations.

The uneven spatial pattern of SCN1A missense mutations by exon revealed that exon 22 had the highest mutation density (111 mutations per 100 bp), followed by exons 4, 15, 2, 8 and 5, most of which were the exons encoding segments S4–S6. Further spatial distribution by structural domain showed that missense mutations had higher mutation densities in functional structures such as the voltage sensor and the pore region than on basic structures (e.g., D-linker, S1–S3). One of the explanations may be the clinical ascertainment bias. Mutations in the voltage sensor and pore region can cause severe phenotypes (e.g., DS) that are receiving increased clinical attention [28], while mutations in the “insulating” region can cause a milder phenotype that may be ignored and do not undergo SCN1A mutation screening. In contrast, protein truncating mutations, including nonsense mutations, frameshift mutations, and splice site mutations that lead to the absence or aberrant synthesis of the gene product, are associated with phenotypes of similar clinical severity. Therefore, these variants had no obvious hotspots in terms of exons or structural domains.

The structure-function relationships of the Nav1.1 channel protein may be another reason for the nonrandom pattern of missense mutations. The S5–S6 segments form the pore region and play an important role in ion selectivity; S4 serves as a voltage sensor and is crucial for action potential initiation [1, 2, 29]. Single amino acid substitutions within these segments can alter ion specificity and excitability, thereby causing seizures. SCN1A mutations in pore regions are commonly associated with LOF, whereas mutations in regions of channel inactivation (S4–5 and D3–4 linkers) are often associated with GOF [13, 28, 30]. Functional property analyses on 437 sodium channel-variants demonstrated that pore-forming regions were frequently associated with LOF variants, inactivation domains were associated with GOF, and voltage-sensing regions were associated with variants with both LOF and GOF [30]. The evidence showed that the types and/or locations of SCN1A mutations can predict the functional property of mutations to some extent. Previously studies have indicated that SCN1A mutations do not exclusively affect inhibitory neurons [31, 32], but also excitatory neurons [12]. Deficits in the channel Nav1.1 in the inhibitory neurons are indisputable for the pathophysiology of severe phenotype, such as DS [33]. The excitatory neuronal networks were affected differently depending on the type of SCN1A mutation; for instance, the missense versus nonsense mutations and pore domain versus voltage-sensing domain influence the excitatory network phenotype. However, these effects on excitatory neuronal networks did not correlate with the clinical severity [12].

The present study revealed that there were three times more frameshift deletions than frameshift insertions, which is similar to findings in other human genes [34]. The three most common frameshift mutations are c.5536_5539delAAAC, c.4554dupA, and c.5010_5013delGTTT, which were repeatedly reported 16, 8, and 7 times, respectively. All three most common frameshift mutations occurred in a sequence context of short nucleotide repeats. These repetitive sequences are prone to slipped-strand mispairing (SSM) during DNA replication or repair, leading to insertion or deletion errors. Specifically, when DNA polymerase or other repair enzymes slip over these repetitive sequences, mismatches can occur. These mismatches may result in the insertion or deletion of one or more nucleotides, thereby causing frameshift mutations [35, 36].

Previous studies have identified several disease-associated mutations in intron 20 that are within an extremely highly conserved mammalian sequence, the “poison” exon (PE), 20N, whose inclusion is predicted to lead to transcript degradation [37]. Aantisense oligonucleotide can prevent the inclusion of the PE 20N in human SCN1A, increasing the production of the SCN1A transcript and NaV1.1 expression [38, 39]. In the present study, splicing mutations were most often identified in exon 4, suggesting a targeted therapeutic direction for clinical intervention in this specific region.

Taken together, the results of this study revealed that the distribution of SCN1A mutations is nonrandom. Hotspots, such as CpG dinucleotides or an exon encoding a key part of the biological function of the protein, were highly susceptible to mutation. We emphasize that mutation detection strategies should focus on CpG dinucleotides in a critical domain of the protein, especially CGA (arginine) codons, which can create termination codons terminated by C > T transitions. Since such nonsense mutations are, on average, more deleterious than missense mutations, they may reasonably be expected to result in phenotypes that are more readily detectable clinically. Higher mutation density in particular regions, such as exon 22 and exon 4, offers promising avenues for targeted therapeutic interventions, such as precision medicine approaches and gene editing strategies.

Conclusions

This study revealed the characteristic spatial and frequency distribution of mutations in SCN1A, which demonstrated a nonrandom pattern with mutations clustered at distinct sites, depending on the characteristic CpG dinucleotides, exons, and functional domains.

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

aa:

amino acids

DS:

Dravet syndrome

GOF:

Gain of function

LOF:

Loss of function

PE:

Poison exon

References

  1. de Lera RM, Kraus RL. Voltage-gated sodium channels: structure, function, pharmacology, and clinical indications. J Med Chem. 2015;58:7093–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Catterall WA. From ionic currents to molecular mechanisms: the structure and function of voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron. 2000;26:13–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meng H, Xu HQ, Yu L, Lin GW, He N, Su T, et al. The SCN1A mutation database: updating information and analysis of the relationships among genotype, functional alteration, and phenotype. Hum Mutat. 2015;36:573–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petrovski S, Scheffer IE, Sisodiya SM, O’Brien TJ, Berkovic SF. Lack of replication of association between scn1a SNP and febrile seizures. Neurology. 2009;73:1928–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace RH, Scheffer IE, Barnett S, Richards M, Dibbens L, Desai RR, et al. Neuronal sodium-channel alpha1-subunit mutations in generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68:859–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Harkin LA, McMahon JM, Iona X, Dibbens L, Pelekanos JT, Zuberi SM, et al. The spectrum of SCN1A-related infantile epileptic encephalopathies. Brain. 2007;130:843–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulley JC, Nelson P, Guerrero S, Dibbens L, Iona X, McMahon JM, et al. A new molecular mechanism for severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy: exonic deletions in SCN1A. Neurology. 2006;67:1094–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sadleir LG, Mountier EI, Gill D, Davis S, Joshi C, DeVile C, et al. Not all SCN1A epileptic encephalopathies are Dravet syndrome: Early profound Thr226Met phenotype. Neurology. 2017;89:1035–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Papp-Hertelendi R, Tényi T, Hadzsiev K, Hau L, Benyus Z, Csábi G. First report on the association of SCN1A mutation, childhood schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder without epilepsy. Psychiatry Res. 2018;270:1175–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vahedi K, Depienne C, Le Fort D, Riant F, Chaine P, Trouillard O, et al. Elicited repetitive daily blindness: a new phenotype associated with hemiplegic migraine and SCN1A mutations. Neurology. 2009;72:1178–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Menezes LFS, Sabiá Júnior EF, Tibery DV, Carneiro LDA, Schwartz EF. Epilepsy-related voltage-gated sodium channelopathies: a review. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:1276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. van Hugte EJH, Lewerissa EI, Wu KM, Scheefhals N, Parodi G, van Voorst TW, et al. SCN1A-deficient excitatory neuronal networks display mutation-specific phenotypes. Brain. 2023;146:5153–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cannon SC. Epilepsy channelopathies go neddy: stabilizing NaV1.1 channels by neddylation. J Clin Invest. 2021;131:e148370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Escayg A, MacDonald BT, Meisler MH, Baulac S, Huberfeld G, An-Gourfinkel I, et al. Mutations of SCN1A, encoding a neuronal sodium channel, in two families with GEFS+2. Nat Genet. 2000;24:343–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujiwara T, Sugawara T, Mazaki-Miyazaki E, Takahashi Y, Fukushima K, Watanabe M, et al. Mutations of sodium channel alpha subunit type 1 (SCN1A) in intractable childhood epilepsies with frequent generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Brain. 2003;126:531–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Depienne C, Trouillard O, Gourfinkel-An I, Saint-Martin C, Bouteiller D, Graber D, et al. Mechanisms for variable expressivity of inherited SCN1A mutations causing Dravet syndrome. J Med Genet. 2010;47:404–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okumura A, Uematsu M, Imataka G, Tanaka M, Okanishi T, Kubota T, et al. Acute encephalopathy in children with Dravet syndrome. Epilepsia. 2012;53:79–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scheffer IE, Nabbout R. SCN1A-related phenotypes: Epilepsy and beyond. Epilepsia. 2019;60(Suppl 3):S17–s24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans DG, Burghel GJ, Smith MJ. Differential rates of germline heterozygote and mosaic variants in NF2 may show varying propensity for meiotic or mitotic mutation. J Med Genet. 2023;60:838–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Denissenko MF, Chen JX, Tang MS, Pfeifer GP. Cytosine methylation determines hot spots of DNA damage in the human P53 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3893–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. You YH, Li C, Pfeifer GP. Involvement of 5-methylcytosine in sunlight-induced mutagenesis. J Mol Biol. 1999;293:493–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Soussi T, Béroud C. Significance of TP53 mutations in human cancer: a critical analysis of mutations at CpG dinucleotides. Hum Mutat. 2003;21:192–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bird AP. CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation. Nature. 1986;321:209–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M, Harris CC. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:4855–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tomatsu S, Montaño AM, Nishioka T, Gutierrez MA, Peña OM, Tranda Firescu GG, et al. Mutation and polymorphism spectrum of the GALNS gene in mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (Morquio A). Hum Mutat. 2005;26:500–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Flanigan KM, Dunn DM, von Niederhausern A, Soltanzadeh P, Gappmaier E, Howard MT, et al. Mutational spectrum of DMD mutations in dystrophinopathy patients: application of modern diagnostic techniques to a large cohort. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:1657–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Holmila R, Bornholdt J, Suitiala T, Cyr D, Dictor M, Steiniche T, et al. Profile of TP53 gene mutations in sinonasal cancer. Mutat Res. 2010;686:9–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brunklaus A, Brünger T, Feng T, Fons C, Lehikoinen A, Panagiotakaki E, et al. The gain of function SCN1A disorder spectrum: novel epilepsy phenotypes and therapeutic implications. Brain. 2022;145:3816–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bryson A, Petrou S. SCN1A channelopathies: Navigating from genotype to neural circuit dysfunction. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1173460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Brunklaus A, Feng T, Brünger T, Perez-Palma E, Heyne H, Matthews E, et al. Gene variant effects across sodium channelopathies predict function and guide precision therapy. Brain. 2022;145:4275–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheah CS, Yu FH, Westenbroek RE, Kalume FK, Oakley JC, Potter GB, et al. Specific deletion of NaV1.1 sodium channels in inhibitory interneurons causes seizures and premature death in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:14646–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun Y, Paşca SP, Portmann T, Goold C, Worringer KA, Guan W, et al. A deleterious Nav1.1 mutation selectively impairs telencephalic inhibitory neurons derived from Dravet Syndrome patients. Elife. 2016;5:e13073.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chopra R, Isom LL. Untangling the dravet syndrome seizure network: the changing face of a rare genetic epilepsy. Epilepsy Curr. 2014;14:86–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Podlutsky A, Osterholm AM, Hou SM, Hofmaier A, Lambert B. Spectrum of point mutations in the coding region of the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (hprt) gene in human T-lymphocytes in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 1998;19:557–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Levinson G, Gutman GA. Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:203–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Teekas L, Sharma S, Vijay N. Terminal regions of a protein are a hotspot for low complexity regions and selection. Open Biol. 2024;14:230439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Carvill GL, Engel KL, Ramamurthy A, Cochran JN, Roovers J, Stamberger H, et al. Aberrant Inclusion of a poison exon causes Dravet syndrome and related SCN1A-associated genetic epilepsies. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;103:1022–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yuan Y, Lopez-Santiago L, Denomme N, Chen C, O’Malley HA, Hodges SL, et al. Antisense oligonucleotides restore excitability, GABA signalling and sodium current density in a Dravet syndrome model. Brain. 2024;147:1231–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Han Z, Chen C, Christiansen A, Ji S, Lin Q, Anumonwo C, et al. Antisense oligonucleotides increase Scn1a expression and reduce seizures and SUDEP incidence in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12:eaaz6100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was funded by Research Foundation of China Association Against Epilepsy (CU-2024-042), Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (A2024536), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82071548, Grant No. 82301639 and Grant No. 82201609), and Guangzhou Medical University Student Innovation Ability Promoting Program (Grant No. 2022A045 and Grant No. 02-408-240603131135). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, and decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Na He and Weiping Liao designed the study, administered the project, and revised the manuscript. Mengwen Zhang and Jing Guo completed the collection of the data, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. Bin Li contributed to the data analysis and interpretation. Kang Liu, Jiayuan Zhao, Jiayuan Zhang, and Xuqing Lin contributed to the data organization. Bin Tang and Jie Wang performed the data analysis and provided technical assistance. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weiping Liao or Na He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University (approval number 2023-ks-59). The research data are all collected from the published papers and adhered to the principles of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors concerning patient consent for research or participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Author Weiping Liao is the member of the Editorial Board for Acta Epileptologica, who was not involved in the journal’s review of, or decisions related to this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, M., Guo, J., Li, B. et al. Characteristic spatial and frequency distribution of mutations in SCN1A. Acta Epileptologica 6, 37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42494-024-00178-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42494-024-00178-z

Keywords